Skip to main content

Optimizing RRSP withdrawals with CPP

Dan and Kate McGlovin are both 60 years old and have just retired.  They each have exactly $500,000 in RRSP savings and both of them will receive 85% of their CPP and 100% of their OAS at age 65. They own a house worth $700,000 that is mortgage free.  They have no other savings, no pensions, no debt, and no kids. 

Their RRSPs are invested in a low cost balanced asset allocation ETF which consists of 60% globally diversified equities (stocks) and 40% bonds.  The expected return on this ETF is 5.22% less management expense fees of 0.25% for a total annual return of 4.97%.  Inflation is assumed to run at 2.2% per year and we have set their life expectancy at 95. They plan to take OAS at age 65.

Also, Dan and Kate want to live in their house until they die and want to pass the proceeds of their estate to their favourite charity upon their death.  In other words, they do not want to use their home equity to fund their retirement.

How Much can Dan and Kate Spend Each Month?

They want to know the maximum amount they can spend each month (and not run out of money) and when is the best time for them to take CPP.  In other words, what is their optimal combined RRSP withdrawal and CPP retirement strategy?

Before we get to the numbers, the above scenario may seem overly simple, and to some degree it is, but I've deliberately set the parameters this way so as to:

a) Mimic something that is realistic and also achievable for most middle class Canadians. This includes use of RRSPs as a primary retirement savings vehicle (a 2023 BMO survey found that 62 per cent of Canadians have either already contributed to their Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) in 2023 or plan to do so).

b) Minimize other variables so we can focus on RRSPs and CPP and the importance of decisions surrounding these two key factors for retirees

OK, the numbers!  Based on them running out of investment assets at exactly age 95 and assuming everything else holds true, here is what they can spend if they take CPP at age 60, 65, or 70:


The later they take CPP the more they can spend each month for their entire lives! This also means that they are drawing more aggressively from their RRSPs in early retirement to cover expenses while they wait for OAS and CPP to kick in. And, curiously, they will also pay more income taxes in retirement the longer they defer CPP.

How can Dan and Kate have more to spend but also pay more taxes?

To figure this out, it's best to understand how CPP works.

First, know that if you start CPP before age 65, payments will decrease by 0.6% each month (or by 7.2% per year), up to a maximum reduction of 36% if you start at age 60.   If you start CPP after age 65, payments will increase by 0.7% each month (or by 8.4% per year), up to a maximum increase of 42% if you start at age 70.  The longer you wait for CPP, the more you get each month. 

Second, and this is less well known, once you start taking CPP, annual increases to your CPP payment track the Canadian consumer price index (or inflation value).   However, before you take CPP, your future CPP payments are instead tracked to Canadian wage growth which has historically run about 1.0% above inflation.  So, for Dan and Kate, and assuming the wage growth trend holds, they would actually get an additional 10.5% increase by taking CPP at 70 versus 60. 

Third, you may have noticed in the table above at age 60, we set the % of maximum CPP at 90% instead of 85%.  Why?  Well, this has to do with the so-called CPP "drop out" provision. You might have years of low or no earnings and so when CPP is calculated, the government will “drop out” or not include up to 17% of your lowest earning years from your earnings history thus increasing your overall CPP amount.  In the case of taking CPP at age 60 versus 65 or later, this shortens you CPP contributory period and may increase your % of CPP maximum.  Now this is a very complex factor, and results will vary from person to person, but to simulate for this analysis, I have assumed a 5% increase to 90% maximum of CPP.  This actually works against taking CPP at 65 or 70, but I wanted to include it to illustrate that, in general, you are still better off deferring CPP.

As an aside, you can find out what you can expect from CPP by logging into the Service Canada website where you can review your contributions and get an estimate of your CPP amount at age 65. Just remember that the estimate they provide assumes you will contribute to CPP through age 65.  But, if you have retired early or are thinking of doing so, you can still get an accurate estimate by using this CPP calculator put together by Doug Runchey, a long time CPP employee, and Certified Financial Planner David Field.

Other Benefits of Deferring CPP

Moving past the table above there are less obvious, but just as compelling, reasons to defer CPP past age 60.  CPP is something you get for life and is indexed to inflation.  It is more valuable than most people realize and offers protection against specific adverse conditions:

a) CPP is a hedge against inflation.  Periods of high inflation generally do not bode well for equities, bonds, or cash meaning that while both your investments and their purchasing power sink, your CPP payments will retain their value and purchasing power.

b) CPP is a hedge against longevity risk. Mathematically, the risk of depleting your portfolio of stocks and bonds increases the longer you live.  As an annuity, CPP is paid to you no matter how long you live.

c) CPP is a hedge against sequence of returns risk.  While many people think they can do better than CPP in their own investments, it's important to note that CPP provides a minimum and known level of income through all market conditions and at no risk.  CPP will do well in the scenarios where investments typically do not do well.

What if one of Dan or Kate Dies Early?

There is one risk of deferring CPP that I wanted to examine which is the death of one of the spouses at, say, age 70.  If you defer CPP to age 70, then having one spouse pass away exactly at that time would be the worst timing financially. This is due to three factors:

a) OAS does not transfer from the deceased spouse to the living one, it simply disappears

b) CPP only transfers as a survivor's benefit and will not cover the combined CPP amounts being paid to Dan and Kate while both are alive

c) In the scenario where CPP is deferred to age 65 or 70, Dan and Kate are drawing down their RRSP more aggressively and so they have less of their own wealth available.  This magnifies the problems of losing OAS and getting a reduced CPP for the survivor.

In order to provide the most realistic comparison, we will assume that the survivor will be able to reduce their spending and live off 70% of the $5800 monthly income from the "Take CPP at age 60" scenario (i.e. 70% of $5800 = $4060 per month).  Here are the results:


As you can see, taking CPP at age 70 does create a problem and then only very late in life.  In this case, Kate has the option of downsizing her home, selling it, or even getting a reverse mortgage to fund her remaining years.

Conclusions

While everyone's circumstances are different, if you are in good health, and have a reasonable amount of assets that can be used in the early years of retirement, deferring CPP by drawing down RRSP funds first puts more spending money in your pocket and reduces your overall risk.

My hope also is that you see these decisions can have a material impact on your retirement, and while it seems complicated (and it is), the data is readily available for you to do the calculations and consider your options carefully.  You really should do so, or insist that your financial advisor do so on your behalf.


Comments

  1. "Thank you for this insightful article! You've done a great job of explaining how a financial advisor can serve as a key financial partner, guiding us through complex financial decisions." Lifestyle Money Management is a firm of Financial Advisor in Adelaide.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You are probably paying too much in investment fees

Are you paying too much in investment fees?  Probably. That is, and per research from Questrade and as further discussed in this article from Moneysense, Canadians are still paying too much in investment fees . The Questrade survey found that 87% of Canadians either don’t know or underestimate the difference that a 2% or 1% fee has on their portfolios over the long run (of 20-plus years). We've all seen the TV ads too.  You know, those smug and smarmy investors talking about fees with their brother, friend, or parent and how it can mean a 30% difference to your portfolio value in retirement.  The truth is...this is not far off. Let's use an example to illustrate Jim is 40, single, and earns $95,000 per year.  Jim has managed to save $130,000 in his RRSP and $30,000 in his TFSA.  Jim is also disciplined and plans to save $1000 per month to his RRSP and $500 per month to his TFSA until his planned retirement at age 65.  At retirement, Jim hopes to have a $5000 per month spending

Free Money for Canadians!

Money So they say Is the root of all evil today But if you ask for a rise It's no surprise that they're giving none away  - Pink Floyd, "Money" from the album The Dark Side of the Moon So, are "they" really giving none away?  They are, and Canadians have some excellent sources of free money! Group R egistered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) An excellent source of free money is a group RRSP where  employers match employee contributions up to a certain amount (or percent).    This is one of the easiest ways you can earn free money.   Now some of you might be thinking this is an obvious source of free money, but according to a 2023  SunLife study , 73% is the average participation but with some industries participation rates are as low as 57%.  SunLife also reported little change in participation from their 2021 report. It seems that many employees are not getting the message and so it's worth repeating. With that, let's dive in. A group registered retir

Where can I get financial advice?

There was a very interesting question posted on our local community Facebook page the other day.  The original poster was looking for a financial advisor recommendation.  Specifically, someone that could help with retirement planning and to help answer big questions like paying down a mortgage versus saving.  In this case, the poster also made it clear they were not looking for commission-based help that would “push products”. The comments section of the post was quite lively and largely civil.  I reviewed all the responses and most of them fell into four main categories: Specific advisor recommendations (i.e. precisely answering what the original poster had asked).  Good job to those posters! Suggestions to use “free” advisors such as big bank or institutional advisors Suggestions that advisors were not needed and that you can just “do-it-yourself”.  This was often accompanied by a suggestion to watch Youtuber “X”, read book “Y”, or consult website “Z” Specific, some good but most bad